San Francisco
Health care Security Ordinance
UPDATE
|
The San Francisco
Health Care Security Ordinance (HCSO) is a “play or pay”
regulation that requires employers who do not meet minimum
healthcare spending thresholds to pay the City for any
shortfall. The employer funding requirements become effective
for most employers with more than 50 employees on January 1,
2008.
The HCSO has been challenged in federal court on ERISA
preemption grounds. The case was heard on November 2, 2007 and
at this time we continue to wait for the judge’s ruling even
as the compliance deadline approaches. The City has confirmed
that in the absence of specific guidance from the courts the
ordinance will take effect on January 1, 2008.
This Insight article provides an overview of an action
plan that may be followed by employers with respect to a short
term compliance strategy under the SF HCSO. This short term
approach focuses on good faith compliance efforts and is
designed to minimize employer time and financial commitments
to the HCSO pending a) the resolution of legal challenges to
the HCSO; and b) additional guidance from the City related to
compliance requirements. The action plan outlined in this Insight
is not legal counsel and employers are encouraged to seek
legal counsel should they require more definitive guidance
with respect to their compliance strategy.
|
|
|
|
| For more information on the HCSO regulations, visit:
|
|
|
|
We believe that a
prudent short term approach will focus on paying the City (a “Pay
In” strategy) for any spending shortfall that occurs during the
first quarter of 2008. This Pay In approach takes advantage of the
provision of the HCSO that allows for payment to the City of any
spending shortfall within 30 days following the close of the
calendar quarter. As such, this provision will provide the employer
with additional time to assess the results of legal challenges to
the HCSO.
In the event that compliance is no longer required or postponed
during Q1 2008, the Pay In approach will have avoided any actual
cash outlay and it will also have avoided making a longer term
commitment to benefit spend for impacted employees (i.e., expanding
benefit eligibility or creating new FSA or HRA benefits plans).
Should compliance with the regulations be upheld during Q1 2008,
employers will be able to choose to either continue their Pay In
approach or to adopt a new HCSO compliance plan.
For employers adopting the Pay In approach, following are the
minimum reasonable steps to take:
Prior to January 1, 2008
- Confirm you are a
covered employer. Any for-profit company with more the 20
employees (or non-profit with more than 50 employees) that is
required to have a Business Registration Certificate from the
City is a covered employer.
- Obtain Voluntary
Waiver Forms signatures from covered employees who are
waiving coverage due to coverage through another employer.
- The form requires
certain information that is typically not collected by
employers from employees opting out.
- Employers may be
able to request the information in another format (existing
“universal” or other forms) if the required information is
included.
- It is important to
note that the regulations only permit exclusion of employees
who opt out AND who have coverage under another employer. As
such, it appears that employees who opt out and do not have
health insurance or who have individual health insurance
policies are not eligible to be excluded from the employer’s
required expenditures.
Prior to and During Q1 2008
-
Identify all Eligible employees working at least 10 hours/week in San Francisco.
- Excluded employees
- Employees who have not reached the
first of the month following 90 days of service
- Independent contractors not classified as employees
- Leased employees (if the leasing
company has specifically assumed responsibility for HCSO
compliance)
- Employees who have waived coverage
under the group benefits and meet the waiver requirement
described above
- Managerial, supervisory, or
confidential employees, unless such employees earn under
$76,851 annually (or $36.95 hourly) in 2008
- Included employees
- Telecommuting employees
- Leased employees (unless the leasing company has specifically assumed responsibility for HCSO compliance)
-
Ensure tracking systems can capture the number of hours employees are paid while working in San Francisco each week.
- Identify the number of hours worked by eligible employees.
- Hours paid per month can be capped at 172.
- Exempt employees can be assumed to work 40 hours per week.
- Vacation, sick and other time off counts as “paid” and must be pro-rated for employees working intermittently within city boundaries.
-
Identify the total amount of employer funding for medical, dental, vision, EAP or other health benefits and determine the average
spend per hour for employees covered under each plan.
-
On a quarterly basis, divide the total employer healthcare spend (total premiums less employee contributions) by the total hours worked for employees enrolled in each plan (HMO will be calculated separately from PPO). Because this calculation allows for the blending of employee and dependent premiums, most employers will be spending more than the required amount for employees enrolled in group health plans. The table below is a simple example of the calculation for two hypothetical health plans.
| |
Covered
Employees (A) |
Total
Quarterly Premium (B) |
Employee Contribution (C) |
Employer Contribution (D) |
Number of Hours Paid for Quarter (E) |
Expenditure per Hour for Covered Employees (F) |
|
|
|
|
|
(B
- C) |
|
(D
/ E) |
|
HMO
Plan |
100 |
$200,000 |
$50,000 |
$150,000 |
50,000 |
$3.00 |
|
Dental
Plan |
80 |
$50,000 |
$0 |
$50,000 |
40,000 |
$1.25 |
- Develop a census indicating the SF hours paid and the spend per hour for employees covered by the SF HCSO during the calendar quarter. Calculate the difference between the actual spend for those employees and the $1.72/hour minimum set by the ordinance ("the shortfall"). A sample calculation for a group of only three employees is included below and it assumes the employer profile outlined in Step
3.
| |
Number of Hours Paid for Quarter
(A) |
Actual Spend per Hour for Medical
(B) |
Actual Spend per Hour for Dental
(C) |
Actual Total Spend per Hour
(D) |
Required Spend per Hour
(E) |
Shortfall per Hour
(F) |
Shortfall
in $
(G) |
|
|
|
|
|
(B + C) |
|
(D
- E) |
(A x F) |
|
EE #1 |
480 |
$3.00 |
$1.25 |
$4.25 |
$1.72 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
EE #2 |
480 |
$0.00 |
$1.25 |
$1.25 |
$1.72 |
$0.47 |
$225.60 |
|
EE #3 |
80 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1.72 |
$1.72 |
$137.60 |
|
Total (payable to
the City or as other qualified expenditure) |
$363.20 |
- Any shortfall will require further payments to or on behalf of employees for whom the employer is not meeting the minimum spending requirements. This payment can be made to the City by April 30, 2008. More details are expected from the City as to how these payments are to be made.
Next Steps
Contact your ArlenGroup consultant to discuss how this
proposed compliance strategy aligns with your company’s fact
pattern.
This document is not intended to provide any legal advice or analysis. Please
consult your own legal counsel for further information on the topics discussed in this
issue of Insight.
|