|
|
Volume 13, Issue 13 |
October 13, 2009 |
See
Archives
|
 |
Federal Healthcare Reform Analysis
(Update #3)
Earlier today the Senate Finance Committee passed a
healthcare reform bill that provides the best look at
legislation that may emerge from Congress. The new
legislation is projected to lead to the provision of
insurance coverage to as many as 29 million of an estimated
56 million people who do not have coverage.
The bill is expected to cost in excess of $850 billion over
the next ten years with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
preliminarily projecting that the bill will not add to the
national debt. Revenues to fund the bill are expected to be
garnered from Medicare savings ($500B), new taxes ($350B)
and fees levied against insurers and medical device
manufacturers ($10+B).
|
For the first time in what has been a politically charged
process, a Republican broke ranks and voted in favor of the
legislation. Maine Republican Senator Olympia Snowe voted
with 13 Democrats in supporting the bill, but cautioned that
her vote on the bill once it reaches the full Senate will be
subject to the final language that emerges once competing
Senate and House bills are reconciled.
Key components
and data points related to the bill approved by the Finance
Committee include:
 |
Individual Mandate
– Most Americans will be required to have health
insurance or be subject to a penalty that can
ultimately include imprisonment. Annual fines for
failing to procure coverage could be as high as $750
per individual. Income based government subsidies
will be available to make coverage more affordable.
The level of penalties and subsidies are certain to
be hotly debated as the legislative process unfolds.
Opponents to healthcare reform have argued that the
US Constitution doesn’t empower the Federal
government to mandate that citizens buy any good or
service, and for this reason it's possible that the
provision could face a Supreme Court challenge if
enacted.
|
 |
Limited Employer Play or
Pay – Employers will not be required to
provide health insurance coverage, however employers
with 50 or more employees will be required to
reimburse the government for healthcare subsidies
provided to employees.
|
 |
Limits on Copays, Deductibles and Pre-Existing
Conditions – Among other provisions,
insurers (and presumably employer sponsored health
plans) will be restricted or prohibited in their
ability to levy pre-existing condition limitations.
In addition, the legislation imposes limits on
copays, deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums,
provisions that are likely to increase premiums for
some employer health plans and call into question
the viability of consumer directed health plans that
commonly feature high deductibles and out-of-pocket
maximums.
|
 |
Taxes on High Value Plans
– To help fund the cost of the bill,
employer health plan benefits provided in excess of
defined limits will be subject to a 40% premium tax.
These limits, which would become effective in 2013,
may ultimately vary by state and/or employer risk
factors but initial estimates are that healthcare
benefits in excess of $8,000 for an individual and
$21,000 for a family would be taxable at the 40%
rate. The high value tax will be strongly opposed by
union groups who will argue in favor of increased
taxes on high wage earners.
|
 |
No Public Option –
The bill does not include what has become a
controversial public option to compete against
private insurers. The bill does enable and include
funding for the creation of state based non-profit
purchasing cooperatives that would allow individuals
and small businesses another coverage option.
|
 |
No Tort Reform –
The bill does not include specific steps to reform
the tort system as it pertains to healthcare.
Rather, the Senate would encourage states to
“develop and test alternatives to the current civil
litigation system as a way of improving patient
safety, reducing medical errors, encouraging the
efficient resolution of disputes, increasing the
availability of prompt and fair resolution of
disputes, and improving access to liability
insurance, while preserving an individual's right to
seek redress in court.”
|
 |
Medicaid Expansion
– State run Medicaid eligibility would be
standardized at 133% of the poverty level. It isn’t
clear to what degree Federal funds would be
allocated to reimburse states for the cost of
expanding Medicaid coverage.
|
 |
Insurance Industry Feedback
– The day before the Finance Committee vote,
the insurance industry’s main lobbying group,
America’s Health Insurance Plans, released a study
claiming that the proposed legislation will lead to
an 11% increase in private and employer based
premiums. The study, which was authored by Price
Waterhouse Coopers, projects the price increase
because it believes the penalties for opting out of
coverage are too weak and as a result the newly
insured population will not include enough healthy
people to offset the cost of the unhealthy. |
What’s Next?
House and Senate leaders will work to reconcile competing
provisions amongst various bills. This is likely to take at
least 60 days and among the most controversial topics to be
debated will be:
1. Public
Option vs. Purchasing Cooperatives
2. Tax on High Value Plans vs. Tax on
High Income Earners
3. Individual Mandate vs. Employer
Mandate
4. Limits on benefit provisions
including deductibles, coinsurance and out-of-pocket
maximums
5. Amendments specifically prohibiting
government funding of abortion
6. Amendments specifically prohibiting
coverage for undocumented workers
There is no certainty that
legislation will ultimately be passed through Congress and
enacted. While a bill is likely to make it out of the House
of Representatives, it does not appear that Democrats have
the 60 votes required to break a potential filibuster in the
Senate. Senate opposition comes not just from Republican
ranks, but from moderate Democrats who are concerned about
the overall price tag of the bill and its impact on the
economy.
|
Questions
or Comments?
Please submit
your questions or comments regarding this issue to info@arlengroup.com
or call (415) 733-7000.
|
|
The Insight newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice but perspective on recent regulatory issues,
trends and standards affecting employee benefits. Please consult your own legal counsel for further information on the topics discussed in this issue of Insight.
|
|
ArlenGroup
| 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1750 | San Francisco,
CA 94104 | 415-733-7000
|
|